The EPR (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein%E2%80%93Podolsky%E2%80%93Rosen_paradox) paradox suggests that entanglement breaks the principle of maximum speed—the speed of light, C.
Entanglement, as the only interaction, does indeed break it. It has been observed to occur at speeds exceeding the speed of light. So…?
The principle of the maximum speed of light is inviolable. Either it’s a principle without exceptions, or we need to figure out what’s going on.
Physicists often claim that this interaction doesn’t violate Einstein’s principle because it doesn’t transmit anything valuable!! Yes, think about it—they frequently assert that if we examine the quantum state of one particle and the negation appears on the entangled particle, it’s nothing valuable. This information is transmitted at speeds greater than the speed of light. They explain that since the examined state of the particle is random, you’re transmitting random, worthless information—something that doesn’t matter xD.
Suddenly, quantum computers appear, and they actually do something concrete. They compute something valuable, thanks to entanglement, which breaks Einstein’s fundamental principle on which the Special Theory of Relativity is based. Do these people think? Do they not know everything?
There’s the SQUS theory (https://squs.org), which says that in the universe, there’s only one sphere of uncertainty, not 10^35 independent spheres per meter. Current physics claims that for every meter of space, there are that many independent uncertainties, which is why we talk about vacuum energy. In short, the SQUS hypothesis states that if you look at a very high magnification—even higher—people in Australia and Europe will suddenly see the same thing. They’ll see the same particle, or rather its de Broglie waves, as we approach uncertainty, and they blur additionally.
The point is that on the macro scale, distances are much larger than on the nano scale, even though we’re referring to the same places in space. Just like the circumference of a circle decreases as we approach the center of the circle. Understand? If I have speed C, close to the center of the circle, that speed seems much greater when we look from above.
Uhhhh. So now, if entanglement occurs close to the sphere of uncertainty—and it does, because that’s where waves appear—the speed of light with which entangled particles interact manifests to us on the macro scale as significantly exceeding the established principles. This happens because, on the macro scale, distances are disproportionately larger than those on the micro scale, even though we’re still talking about the same places in space.
Suddenly, the speed of interaction seems to strangely increase and exceed the speed of light. In reality, it doesn’t. It doesn’t exceed the speed of light.
The same thing happens with the refraction of light in water. Light optimizes time (Fermat’s principle) and will be faster if it spends more time traveling in air rather than in water, where its speed is lower.
It’s the same with Google Maps—if you care about time, you speed down the highway, even if it’s more kilometers. You don’t push through local roads.
Quantum entanglement is at the level of de Broglie waves, close to uncertainty, close to SQUS, making the physical distances between particles significantly smaller. If the speed is the same, namely C, then for us on the macro scale, it turns out to be much too fast.
So, does feeling—or entanglement—also have a certain speed? But we’re too big to measure it.
The smaller the particle and the longer the de Broglie wavelength, the easier and stronger it is to entangle, and then this connection seems faster to us.
Let’s put aside our big Ego, and maybe we’ll experience the joy of entanglement—the feeling of love.
Cheers,
wonabru